A PARTNER AFRICA CASE STUDY

A Private Sector Approach for Addressing Sexual Exploitation, Abuse, and Harassment (SEAH) in the Tea Industry

“The tea industry must recognise SEAH as a critical human rights risk requiring systemic solutions. While crisis management is essential, sustainable change demands long-term cultural transformation, stronger governance and responsibility, and collaborative efforts across the supply chain.”

About the project

In 2024, the Ethical Tea Partnership (ETP) led and commissioned a study to examine how three tea-producing companies (Lipton Tea and Infusions, Browns Plantation Kenya and Lujeri), previously exposed to systemic Sexual Exploitation, Abuse and Harassment (SEAH), responded to the issue and the measures they implemented to protect workers from further harm. The project was jointly undertaken by Claire Lynch Consulting (CLC) and Partner Africa and resulted in a report with actionable insights for industry stakeholders on preventing and addressing SEAH.

Auditors and certification schemes remain important to meet responsible sourcing commitments, especially in identifying immediate health and safety risks and issues related to underpayments or excessive hours. However, within the scope of an audit, it is difficult to identify more sensitive issues, such as those related to gender-based violence and harassment (GBVH) or discrimination. This is especially true for industries where women are particularly vulnerable, such as the tea industry, where there are precarious working conditions, and great power imbalances along the supply chain. In 2023, several Kenyan tea estates were exposed for systemic sexual exploitation, abuse and harassment (SEAH) despite numerous social compliance audits.

Understanding the challenge: What is SEAH?

Sexual Exploitation, Abuse, and Harassment (SEAH) are interconnected forms of gender-based violence (GBV) that occur along a continuum of sexual violence. Sexual Exploitation is the abuse of power or vulnerability for sexual purposes, such as making sexual activity a condition for employment or benefits. Sexual Abuse refers to actual or threatened sexual intrusion through force or coercion, including rape and sexual assault. Sexual Harassment involves unwelcome sexual conduct that creates a hostile or degrading environment, including gestures, comments, or inappropriate materials. SEAH can involve single incidents or ongoing patterns of misconduct. SEAH has been a persistent issue in the tea industry, particularly affecting women workers in low-paid, seasonal jobs on rural plantations where male-dominated management and weak legal enforcement create environments of heightened risk. The colonial-era plantation model, economic dependence on the tea industry, coupled with low tea prices for the producers, and limited access to essential services, further normalise gender-based violence, making proactive interventions crucial for worker protection and business sustainability.

How did we go about doing the research?

The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of crisis management approaches, explore underlying causes of SEAH, and identify sustainable interventions to mitigate SEAH risks in the tea industry. For this study, Partner Africa and CLC used a participatory, multi-method approach that included a case study analysis of the three companies that faced public SEAH allegations, stakeholder engagement with producers, buyers, industry bodies, and civil society organisations, and a review of internal policies, interventions, and response mechanisms. Additionally, targeted desk research was conducted to place findings within broader industry trends.

The 10 causes and contributing factors of SEAH identified

This research led the team to identify 10 key root causes and contributing factors of SEAH:

[1] Power imbalances

Hierarchical management structures concentrate excessive authority in middle-management roles, fostering abuse of power.

[2] Weak governance & accountability

Existing policies were often inconsistently implemented, and grievance mechanisms lacked trust.

[3] Lack of accountability and oversight enables SEAH to persist

Excessive authority in middle management, combined with weak oversight and difficulty in disciplining perpetrators, creates an environment where SEAH goes unchecked.

[4] Ineffective grievance mechanisms discourage SEAH reporting

Workers lack trust in grievance mechanisms due to fear of retaliation, confidentiality concerns, and inconsistent handling of SEAH cases, making reporting unsafe and ineffective.

[5] Weak worker representation limits accountability and trust

Ineffective and influenced worker committees fail to advocate for employees, undermining trust and leaving SEAH concerns unaddressed.

[6] Fear and mistrust prevent workers from reporting SEAH

Power imbalances, lack of transparency, and weak worker voice create an environment of fear, discouraging SEAH reporting and accountability.

[7] Lack of leadership commitment weakens SEAH prevention

Without strong senior management accountability and a culture of gender equality, SEAH remains unaddressed, as leadership prioritises incident reduction over transparency.

[8] Economic vulnerability

Poverty and job insecurity increased workers’ dependence on employers, making them more susceptible to SEAH.

[9] Economic pressures and weak legal systems enable SEAH

Low tea prices limit producers’ ability to address SEAH, while inadequate legal systems and lack of survivor support allow abuses to persist unchecked.

[10] Cultural & social norms

Gender inequalities and entrenched stereotypes normalised SEAH, discouraging reporting.

10 factors a business should consider when publicly exposed for SEAH in its operations

Partner Africa and CLC studied the crisis response mechanisms of the three companies that faced public exposure for SEAH in their operations. The research identified ten critical success factors for responding to SEAH in their businesses. These factors are also applicable to businesses facing other sensitive human rights allegations.

  1. Visible leadership commitment – Senior management played a key role in driving change and ensuring accountability.
  2. Immediate victim-survivor support – Access to medical, legal, and psychosocial support was critical.
  3. Safeguarding actions – Measures to protect all workers and prevent reoccurrence were implemented.
  4. Fair and swift disciplinary action – Perpetrators were investigated and held accountable.
  5. Independent assessments – External experts were engaged to conduct in-depth investigations.
  6. Comprehensive remediation plans – Companies provided long-term support to victim-survivors.
  7. Ongoing monitoring & reporting – Regular assessments that tracked progress and effectiveness.
  8. Worker engagement & communication – Transparent communication helped rebuild trust.
  9. Stakeholder collaboration – Partnerships with buyers, NGOs, and industry bodies strengthened interventions.
  10. Embedding gender-responsive HRDD – Companies integrated gender-sensitive human rights due diligence (GR-HRDD) to prevent future violations.

What are the 10 key lessons and areas of change that businesses need to focus on to prevent systemic SEAH in it is operations?

  1. Traditional compliance approaches are insufficient – Social audits alone cannot prevent SEAH.
  2. Survivor-centred approach is essential – Victim-survivors must be at the core of response mechanisms.
  3. Addressing power imbalances is key – SEAH thrives in workplaces with unchecked managerial authority.
  4. Change requires long-term commitment – Organisational transformation takes 3–5 years.
  5. Worker trust & communication matter – Employers must foster open, transparent engagement.
  6. Impact measurement is crucial – Companies must track quantitative and qualitative SEAH data.
  7. Buyers have influence – Purchasing practices affect working conditions and power dynamics.
  8. Economic pressures contribute to SEAH – Low wages and job insecurity increase vulnerability.
  9. Shared responsibility is needed – SEAH is an industry-wide issue, requiring collective action.
  10. Expertise & resources must be prioritised – Companies need specialised SEAH training and policies.

Project Conclusion

The tea industry must recognise SEAH as a critical human rights risk requiring systemic solutions. While crisis management is essential, sustainable change demands long-term cultural transformation, stronger governance and responsibility, and collaborative efforts across the supply chain. Companies that prioritise gender-responsive human rights due diligence play a critical role in shaping safer, more inclusive environments for tea workers. But there are other key takeaways as well: different actors in the tea supply chain need to collaborate to improve gender equality in leadership and decision-making, ensure worker voices are heard, and foster organisational change that challenges the status quo. Equally important is the need to critically examine the language used to communicate these issues, ensuring it does not unintentionally reinforce existing power dynamics or uphold the very status quo it aims to dismantle.

These recommendations align with Partner Africa’s experience addressing SEAH in other industries, highlighting the broader relevance of this research beyond the tea sector and across Africa.

This project demonstrates the importance of transparency, collaboration, and shared learning across the tea supply chain. By bringing together diverse actors, the research aims to help make tea estates more dignified and equitable workplaces for the many women they employ. We are grateful to ETP for commissioning this important research and for the opportunity to contribute to their ongoing efforts to promote more responsible business practices in tea.

"Different actors in the tea supply chain need to collaborate to improve gender equality in leadership and decision-making, ensure worker voices are heard, and foster organisational change that challenges the status quo. Equally important is the need to critically examine the language used to communicate these issues, ensuring it does not unintentionally reinforce existing power dynamics or uphold the very status quo it aims to dismantle."

We're your partner in responsible business

Championing responsible business in Africa